<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You Ready to DeLurk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freshblogger.com/2007/01/are-you-ready-to-delurk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freshblogger.com/2007/01/are-you-ready-to-delurk/</link>
	<description>Fresh ideas for blogging, making money, and living a more productive life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray</title>
		<link>http://freshblogger.com/2007/01/are-you-ready-to-delurk/comment-page-1/#comment-6588</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshblogger.com/2007/01/are-you-ready-to-delurk/#comment-6588</guid>
		<description>Hi Andy. You make a good point, but I think that danger is always there. The spammers are getting more and more clever every day, it seems. I go through the comment spams that Aksimet traps on a daily basis and there are quite often a couple that I have to take a step back and think about before deleting. 

My usual criteria is that if there are links in the body of the comment, I usually delete it. If the web address linked to in the name part just goes to a spam site, again, I delete it. If ever I&#039;m in doubt, I check out the site before allowing the comment. I guess it&#039;s the price of blogging these days that you have to be extremely vigilant against any forms of comment spam.

I&#039;ve modified Fresh Blogger to allow real links in the comments, too, and actually your writing has influenced me in that regard. I don&#039;t think this type of post presents much more danger of attracting spam than others I&#039;ve written, though. I&#039;ve actually written a couple of other spam bait posts and the spammer response has been manageable. Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment. I really appreciate your joining the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andy. You make a good point, but I think that danger is always there. The spammers are getting more and more clever every day, it seems. I go through the comment spams that Aksimet traps on a daily basis and there are quite often a couple that I have to take a step back and think about before deleting. </p>
<p>My usual criteria is that if there are links in the body of the comment, I usually delete it. If the web address linked to in the name part just goes to a spam site, again, I delete it. If ever I&#8217;m in doubt, I check out the site before allowing the comment. I guess it&#8217;s the price of blogging these days that you have to be extremely vigilant against any forms of comment spam.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve modified Fresh Blogger to allow real links in the comments, too, and actually your writing has influenced me in that regard. I don&#8217;t think this type of post presents much more danger of attracting spam than others I&#8217;ve written, though. I&#8217;ve actually written a couple of other spam bait posts and the spammer response has been manageable. Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to comment. I really appreciate your joining the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://freshblogger.com/2007/01/are-you-ready-to-delurk/comment-page-1/#comment-6481</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freshblogger.com/2007/01/are-you-ready-to-delurk/#comment-6481</guid>
		<description>I saw mention of this over on Copyblogger in one of the comments.

My immediate thoughts were

&quot;&lt;em&gt;What a great way for a comment spammer to justify spamming&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

You could easily write a line like

&quot;As it is national delurking week I have decided to come out of the shadows and congratulate you on a great blog to which I have been a subscriber for a few months&quot;

Then use your blogspam tools for any mention of delurking in the posts

I encourage people to comment by giving them real backlinks from both comments and trackbacks. I don&#039;t think it is a good idea to give them a hook to search for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw mention of this over on Copyblogger in one of the comments.</p>
<p>My immediate thoughts were</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>What a great way for a comment spammer to justify spamming</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>You could easily write a line like</p>
<p>&#8220;As it is national delurking week I have decided to come out of the shadows and congratulate you on a great blog to which I have been a subscriber for a few months&#8221;</p>
<p>Then use your blogspam tools for any mention of delurking in the posts</p>
<p>I encourage people to comment by giving them real backlinks from both comments and trackbacks. I don&#8217;t think it is a good idea to give them a hook to search for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: freshblogger.com @ 2012-02-08 17:36:53 -->
